For industrial QA and metrology teams

This is a lab-side comparison, not a production deployment. You send frames from your rig to our hosted service and compare our reconstruction against a reference measurement you already trust — a profilometer, an interference microscope, a known calibration target. Beside your instrument, not instead of it.

What is in scope

• Reconstructions of frames you export, each with an evidence record that commits to the input and settings and names the software version.
• A written comparison against your reference measurement, stating where the two agree and where they do not.
• A checkable record: your quality team can rerun any result and confirm by provenance ID that the same input, settings and software were used.

What is not offered today

• No in-plant or on-premises deployment. Frames come to the hosted service.
• No line-speed or throughput promise. A single request takes 10–40 seconds on the current host.
• No acquisition hardware or station.
• No accuracy, traceability or uptime guarantee. Our reports state accuracy and repeatability as not-yet-established and traceability as false.

If your need is inside the plant network, at line speed, or tied to an acquisition station, tell us anyway — we log it as demand — but we will not sell you an engagement that cannot meet it.

Questions we ask first

1. What do you measure, and with which reference instrument?
2. Can the frames leave your site? Under what agreement?
3. Is there one stable target you can measure with both?
4. What decision would the comparison feed: a procedure, a supplier question, a second measurement point between service visits?
5. Who on your side signs, and from which budget?

Next step

Answer the same questions in Workflow fit, then read Design partnership and Procurement. Write to system@apertureapi.com.