ApertureAPI GTM Playbook — Overview

Audience: anyone. These pages assume zero prior context (the "16-year-old intern test"). Every step ends in a verifiable artifact — a logged row, a saved result ZIP, a signed PDF, a live URL. If a step does not produce its artifact, it is not done.

Doctrine change (2026-10-29): read page 39 — paid pilot, then purchase before this page. ApertureAPI is an instrument maker and optical computation company: one founder, built to order, no outside capital. The commercial path is a free bounded benchmark, $4,800 of milestone-paid pilot engineering (M1 $2,400 on signing, M2 $2,400 at the signed readout, credited in full to the instrument), then the one product in development built to order on a 50 % deposit: the bench surface profiler, H1 head on the D1 stand, $12,900 (second wavelength +$2,400; software and 90 days of onboarding included). The inline head, the I1 module and the optical computing card are portfolio, unpriced, after the first product qualifies. Parts cost is a design value; the first unit has not been built; prices are offers, not a quote book. Where this page still says "plan", "per run" or "credits", that is evaluation access, not the offer. Hardware costs, the demo-unit build and the ten-year view are on the private sales build (sales-flock sign-in and passcode).

Strategy: who we go after, why, and what we offer (updated 2026-10-29)

The headline: Turn Any Desktop Computer into a 3D Metrology Lab. The subheading: Precision 3D measurement, at cost.

The one sentence to remember: a camera and a laser record a hologram. Our software turns it into a calibrated 3D measurement with proof attached, and for labs without a laser and camera we sell the instrument too.

What we sell:

# Product Status
1 The pilot (page 39): free bounded benchmark, then $4,800 of milestone-paid pilot engineering (M1 build and bench acceptance, M2 signed readout), credited in full to the instrument the offer
2 The instrument (one product in development, built to order on a 50 % deposit): the bench surface profiler, H1 head on the D1 desk stand, $12,900; second wavelength +$2,400; software and 90 days of onboarding included. Research/industrial-QA unit, not certified, not medical. Portfolio (inline head, I1 module) is unpriced until the product qualifies; the research card (P1) is never sold designed, not built, not measured; parts cost is a design value; prices are offers, not a quote book
3 The reconstruction software: upload a hologram, get back a height map, a phase map and an evidence record anyone can recompute live at api.apertureapi.com; evaluation access (metered plans exist, they are not the offer)

Who we go after, why, and which offer (full offer: page 22):

Segment Why they buy Offer
Labs that already record holograms: university holography / interferometry groups, biomedical QPI / DHM labs home-grown scripts, reproducibility, and the reviewer or auditor who asks how a number was made Software Design Partnership: $10,000, ~90 days, 50% at signing / 50% at day 45
Labs and QA benches that want 3D surface or thickness measurement but have no rig: teaching labs, core facilities, industrial lab-side QA (micro-optics, MEMS, semiconductor surfaces), biology / materials groups a $100K+ commercial holographic microscope is out of reach Hardware Design Partnership: $25,000, ~4 months, 50% at signing / 50% on instrument delivery; includes everything in the software deal
Production lines / in-plant not ready: the industrial gates are not met log only (page 21), never approach

Both deals follow the bounded free validation (up to ~20 frames, one rig configuration, one reference measurement, 10 business days).

The supporting story for the Software deal. A lab with a rig today asks an LLM for a NumPy/SciPy reconstruction script and debugs it for a week. That is driving yourself; ApertureAPI is the Lyft: upload a frame, give wavelength, pixel pitch and distance, and get amplitude and phase back with a record of how it was made. Two things are true today and quotable:

Still to build, never claim yet: a measured frame rate, multi-megapixel speed, accuracy against a physical reference, repeatability across instruments, any shipped instrument, any clinical or certified use.

Public lines (approved, all true today): - "Turn any desktop computer into a 3D metrology lab." - "Stop writing reconstruction code. Upload a frame, get amplitude and phase back with the record of how it was made. Free to try." - "Any sensor, any rig: tell us the wavelength, pixel pitch and distance; calibrate pixel pitch from a known target." - "Beat the open-source default: on public ground-truth holograms our inline solver scores 17–30 dB where the pinned open-source package (PyHoloscope 1.1.3) scores about 2 dB on the same frames — benchmark similarity, not measurement accuracy." - "No rig? We build the capture instrument to order inside a Hardware Design Partnership."

Not to say in public until measured: a frame rate, "clinical grade", "certified", an accuracy figure, an error-detection rate, or anything that implies an instrument has shipped. Page 09 and the claims boundary still govern every sentence.

What we are optimising: the pipeline, not signups

Our buyers are labs. A lab buys after its own frames have run through the service, beside a measurement it already trusts, with someone who controls a budget in the conversation. So the primary funnel is five stages, and every page in this playbook exists to move a lab from one stage to the next:

Stage Definition Exit criterion (all must be true) Artifact that proves it
1. Qualified workflow A named person described a real holography or interferometry workflow and it ran through the workflow-fit check verdict tested or needs_review; a named technical contact; the use stated in one sentence; not a production-line or do-not-approach target (page 29) the saved workflow-fit JSON response + log row at stage qualified (page 24)
2. Frames + metadata received Their own frames arrived with the acquisition parameters at least one frame from their rig with wavelength, pixel pitch and distance; reconstruction returned inside 48 hours (page 17) the result ZIP (result ID, evidence record, methods supplement) + logged time-to-result
3. Reference measurement secured They committed one independent measurement of the same target the reference instrument named (profilometer, interference microscope, AFM, calibration target, bead/cell standard) and the file received or a dated written commitment to send it the reference file stored beside the frames, or the commitment email, logged
4. Budget owner identified We know whose money pays and who signs budget owner named, budget source type, signer role, decision window (page 31) the budget columns filled in design-partner-targets.csv + a decision_date in the log
5. Pilot signed A $4,800 milestone-paid pilot (M1 invoiced) or a Phase 2 deposit under page 39 (or, for a software-only lab, a design partnership) is countersigned a Software or Hardware Design Partnership ($10,000 or $25,000 fixed), countersigned by the operator the countersigned PDF filed by the operator; invoice 1 issued

Signups are a secondary diagnostic. We still count them (the scoreboard on page 23), because a sudden drop says a listing or the upload form broke. They are not the goal, and no plan may trade pipeline work for signup volume.

Weekly pipeline KPIs (report every Friday)

KPI Counted as Source of record
Qualified workflows new rows reaching stage 1 this week prospect log + design-partner log, stage qualified
Frames received labs (not files) whose own frames arrived this week, and how many of those got a result inside 48 hours result ZIPs saved + time-to-result column
Reference measurements secured labs reaching stage 3 this week log rows with q3_reference filled and the file or commitment linked
Budget owners identified labs reaching stage 4 this week budget columns + decision_date filled
Pilots signed countersigned engagements this week operator-filed PDFs
Diagnostic: signups signups_total week over week data/scoreboard.csv (sign-in)

Stage counts never go backwards in a report: a lab that stalls keeps its highest stage and gets a next_action_date. Do not round a stage up — a promise to send frames is still stage 1.

New employee? Start at page 23, then page 14

Page 23 — the 30-day pipeline plan is the front door for anyone starting this month: daily quotas on qualified conversations, workflow-fit checks, frames received, 48-hour returns, talks and clinics booked. Page 14 — Start here is the background, the path and the glossary.

The pipeline pages (primary)

Page Stage it moves Buyer page to send
14 Start here all — the path and glossary —
15 Who we sell to targeting — segment positioning the three segment pages below
24 Qualification & workflow fit → 1 workflow fit
16 The message test → 1 the matching segment page
25 Guest methods talks → 1, → 2 methods supplement
26 Monthly lab clinic → 2 reproducibility bundle
17 The 48-hour loop 2 reproducibility bundle
22 The two design partnerships 3 → 5 design partnership brief
31 Budget-owner mapping → 4 procurement packet
20 Closing 4 → 5 procurement packet
27 Co-publication protocol after 5 validation docket
28 Referral note → 1 (warm) workflow fit
29 Industrial inbound qualification → 1 or → log industrial QA
21 Industrial inquiry log out of pipeline —
30 SPIE Photonics West 2027 → 1, → 4 all three segment pages
32 Core-facility referral program → 1 for core facilities
33 Core-facility director briefing opens the facility channel for core facilities
34 Integration demos after 3 (widens a validated workflow) validation docket
35 Watcher single-author outreach → 1, → 2 workflow fit
36 Grant and incubator kit 4 → 5 design partnership brief
18 Free channels → 1 (slow) methods supplement
19 Calibration labs segment test —

Segment buyer pages (send the one that matches the lab, never all three): biomedical QPI / DHM · university holography labs · industrial QA. Evidence pages: validation docket · reproducibility bundle · methods supplement · procurement.

Sales-flock operations (standing pages)

# Page What it is Artifact it produces
9 09 Operator guide SSOT: the customer definition, the offer (free 3-month trial — NO lifetime accounts), personas, tiers, the two-lane engagement flow per-prospect logs, weekly roll-ups
10 10 Partner signing the public reference packet and the qualify → LOI → trial-activation path packet-sent emails, signed LOIs
11 11 Partner LOI blank fill-in LOI for trial partners a countersigned LOI per partner
12 12 Contact databases the prospect universe (sign-in) and the one-row-at-a-time loop per-row research + logged outreach

Discovery plumbing (secondary)

Pages 01–08 are developer listings, registries, a demo host and community accounts. They are useful plumbing — they make the service findable by someone already searching — but they do not generate institutional demand on their own. Do them once, in this order, then leave them; no daily quota on the pipeline pages may be skipped to work on them.

# Page Venue Artifact when done
1 01 PyPI PyPI pypi.org/project/apertureapi-mcp exists
2 02 MCP Registry Official MCP Registry live entry under registry.modelcontextprotocol.io/v0/servers
3 03 Postman Postman Public API Network public workspace URL that loads logged-out
4 04 public-apis PR github.com/public-apis/public-apis merged PR
5 05 Hugging Face Space Hugging Face Spaces (free tier only) live *.hf.space URL producing a reconstruction, or a logged "skipped"
6 06 Registry batch Glama, mcp.so, awesome-mcp-servers three resolving URLs
7 07 Show HN Hacker News (Show HN) live thread URL — timing is an operator decision, do not post without a go
8 08 Communities image.sc, napari Zulip, r/mcp per-venue: account created + rules read; first posts are operator-gated

Order matters: the MCP registry entry needs the PyPI package to exist first, and the public-apis PR needs the Postman collection URL.

Hard rules (read before touching anything)

  1. Claims discipline. Copy-paste only from the prepared copy blocks in these pages. NEVER write a correlation/agreement figure, an error-detection percentage claim, or any frames-per-second number — those have no committed evidence behind them. The honest replacement when asked about agreement: "we publish our agreement numbers against a public dataset, and the report says where it falls short — I'll send it." Quotable without a figure: the SDC closed-loop calibration recovers pixel pitch very tightly on two committed targets (pitch only), and every result ships a re-computable provenance record. Full list of banned forms and their honest replacements: marketing/sales/claims-boundary.md.
  2. Research tooling, not diagnosis; lab-side, not in-plant. To biomedical groups the service is research tooling for reproducibility and continuity — never a diagnostic. To industrial groups it is a lab-side comparison against their reference measurement — never an in-plant, in-line or line-speed promise.
  3. The quickstart is two steps, not one. Calling the public endpoint requires first fetching a form token (GET /public/form_token), waiting at least 3 seconds, then POSTing to /public/reconstruct with the same User-Agent from the same IP. Every curl example in these pages includes the token step. Do not "simplify" it to one curl — it will 403.
  4. Accounts: where a page says to create an account, use the company identity (operator supplies the email/credentials); never a personal one.
  5. Log everything. Date, account used, URL or file, stage, artifact. Progress is countable, not described.
  6. No paid acquisition. No paid ads, paid listings, bought or rented contact lists, sponsorships, booths, or paid demo-host upgrades (page 05 is free tier or skip). The one budgeted event is a visitor badge for SPIE Photonics West 2027, with an operator go. Anything else that costs money needs a written operator go and a reason it moves a lab along the five stages.
  7. No outbound to production lines or do-not-approach targets (page 15, page 29). They may find us; we log them; we do not approach them.